![]() |
Quote:
most my work for the last few years on raptor stuff is posted here: http://www.moddedraptor.com/community/dyno-tuning/ here is STOCk Rap 700 for a Base to compare too http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b3...kraptor700.jpg |
Quote:
here is a 700(686 cc) we did for a customer, using Cuervo racing +1 mm ported head 14:1 compression, drag pipes, 54 mm throttle body and .500 lift cam... a far cry from what you guys are building them for though and the powerband needed for this application as well http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b3...ks/sbss700.jpg http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b3...s/DSC01501.jpg |
thats alot of lift.....wow!!:happy6:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Fitting a HC2 to a XT, loses bottom end power and torque. Big Bore I personally think that the Big Bore is the way forward....for CHEAP power and torque gains throughout the rpm range. But is a Big Bore reliable? ..but Strokers too....for development reasons |
When i had an xt686 with cp piston and stage 3 reprofiled xt cam i had a lot more torque with 12:1 compression than the raptor, HP was 65-67 on the wheel and max torque:75!
|
Steve was that 75nm or 75 ft/lbs of torque?
|
its 75nm of torque on the dyno,i calculated it in ft/lbs its 54.5 about the same with the 80hp raptor torque but mine had less compression,smaller TB,and less lift cam
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
off idle and low rpm torque is good for cruising but what you really want for a fast bike is a broad and flat torque curve that carries into the upper rpm's calculate the torque output by averaging the torque number at 3k,4k,5k,6k,7k, rpm's some peak torque is lost when opening up the top end but well worth the trade off |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 19:57. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions Inc.