You'll notice that I was very careful to highlight "just my opinion of course" in orange in his original quote. At no point did I say his opinion about the Kev mod was wrong, even though I personally don't agree with it and there's a LOT or evidence to suggest otherwise. I merely pointed out a couple of things that ARE factually incorrect about his statements on the general working of the XT660's fuelling control.

As I've all ready said; it is his opinion (to which he's entitled). I just want the members here to see the big picture, the broadest view of things, which is why I suggested not giving credence to ONE person's opinion over thousands of others.

Just because someone has ridden 90 "thousand" (Kms I'd guess) on four teneres doesn't make their opinion any more valid, or right. I drink 90K+ cups of tea a year and it most certainly doesn't make me a tea expert, although I do have an opinion on which I prefer.

I still hold with the opinion that these comments were originally made to stir up trouble, a bee's nest, hence the reference to trolling (and the use of "quite possibly" - I didn't say he was.) As far as I can see he's been doing a successful job stirring things up elsewhere on the Kev mod issue, and he now appears to be doing the same here and through the back door so to speak.

If XT660.com members start falling out with each other over Greg's comments I shall delete this thread. It has been done to death elsewhere on the web. XT660.com is not a portal for inflamatory comments, trolling and scare-mongering, especially when the source doesn't even appear to be a member.

__________________