![]() |
Hi there KLR and welcome to :660: good job on Kev's bike, we've seen the pics and we were all very impressed.
Enjoy your time here |
Quote:
|
Damn you KEV!!!!!....lol
You and your mods got me in a mood to mess around with my XT also. I have 2 700R raptors with me now and I am testing out bigger valves, different valve seat cuts and also new high flow valves. Once I am done with these two raptors I will have more detail on how to get the Xt's head to flow a lot better. You need to get your bike on the dyno to see how much it cranks out now and then I will see if I can catch up to the same power, but going towards stage 2 cam, porting the head, but not increase the XT's capacity. Not sure I will be able to catch up to the 700�s torque output, but worth a go. Hopefully when we are done, we can give these guys two options to make the XT's go. |
If it wasn't for my leg we would have had the results long ago.
I will get a stage 2 cam to try once I have the results from the big bore stage 1 conversion. They very cheap to buy once you have all the extra bits from the Raptor cam. The big bore with stage 1 cam will have more torque, than just flowing the head & a stage 2 cam. The stage 2 & head port with valves should have more HP, I recon. I am looking into the Raptor stroker kits & waiting for my local dealer to pull down a Raptor motor, so I can do some measurements. We both know these motors respond well to more air/fuel & the Raptor forums have proved this. Getting more air/fuel in & out = more HP on these motors. |
Well, if things work out as planned, I might have a XT700 on my dyno soon.
One of the Yamaha dealers I spoke to today built a XT700 for a client, but they bored out the stock XT sleeve to 102mm, installed the raptor 11:1 piston and gasflowed the head. As far as I could tell, it is still running a stock XT cam If their claims pan out, it looks like it makes around 5HP more than a stock XT660X with DNA stage 2, PCIII and Leo Vince Slip-on pipes. But let's wait and see what it make on my own dyno, before we get to excited. Currently it is running a TFI which we all know does not do a good job of fueling the XT and I gave them a Dynatek EFI unit to try out and see if it makes better power. |
I�m eager to see how Kev�s machine will perform on dyno.I�m waiting for my stg 1 and the raptor bits to arrive here in Brazil, if my bike had an improvement with this cam at high rpm�s I will be satisfied,I think the 660 engine is too calm at high rpm�s.My bike is running with Kev mod, both filters and leo vince pipes, my spark plug looks great so I dont think I will have much problems with the fuel mixture after installing the cam.Imagine the Kev XT with the same power as the new KTM 690 ,this will be awesome.:woo::woo:
|
If you are starting tp play with big mods like cams & pistons you need a Power commander to get the fuelling right.
|
Quote:
|
Well the results are out, I am still testing camshafts over the next few days, so more dyno sheets to come.
Just short of 57HP, 56.92 @ 6500RPM. I have lost a bit of the bottom end but gained alot on the top. http://i201.photobucket.com/albums/a...ltersPipes.jpg http://i201.photobucket.com/albums/a...tx/7200RPM.jpg http://i201.photobucket.com/albums/a...evxtx/2-17.jpg http://i201.photobucket.com/albums/a...ore7200RPM.jpg |
Looks like a reasonable gain there, the question is are you happy with it?
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:38. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions Inc.