Home

Go Back   .: XT660.com - The #1 XT660 Resource :. > XT660X & XT660R > XT660X/R Tech Section > XT660X/R Exhausts
FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Main site

Google

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  # 1  
Old 18-09-12, 16:50
Tinbopaloobop Tinbopaloobop is offline
SemiPro XT-Moto
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Oban
Posts: 50
Tinbopaloobop is on a distinguished road
Siliencer length?.. 420 or 380 mm?

I am looking to buy beowulf exhausts but the website gives you 2 options...420mm or 380mm length. What is the difference? Would the longer ones be a louder deeper sound or would that be on the shorter cans? They are both the same price.

Cheers
__________________
west coast baby!
  # 2  
Old 18-09-12, 23:28
maxwell123455 maxwell123455 is offline
XT-Moto SuperStar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Posts: 1,943
maxwell123455 is on a distinguished road
From my understand the shorter one would be louder to there effectively being less of a silcener ie mean more sweet sweet sounds
__________________
Plough on
  # 3  
Old 28-09-12, 13:47
coffeebaron coffeebaron is offline
Expert XT-Moto
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Lancaster
Posts: 68
coffeebaron is on a distinguished road
Smile

If you haven't purchased them already, i'd recommend the 420's- with single's you want a longer length can as the engine relies on big pulses of power from the single to be dissipated- too short an exhaust and you loose power.

I've an interesting point of reference on this- if you check some of my other posts I had a custom set of exhausts made for my xtx, small diameter twin stacked end cans, running about 380mm in length.

I've recently put the standards back on-partly because I'm considering selling it. I can't believe how much better the bike is now. Lessons I've learned is 1) the XTX has the exhausts either side for a reason, the handling and balance get disturbed when it's all one side more than most bikes. 2) My exhausts were VERY loud, and that disguised the drop in perfomance I'd actually experienced, despite the new system weighing about half as much as one of the stock cans-this bike actually deals better with the extra weight.

I've still decided to run the stage 1 & 2 air filters and p/c v. If I was starting out modding the XTX again, these are the only mods I'd get

Phew long reply
  # 4  
Old 28-09-12, 15:11
Pleiades Pleiades is offline
XT-Moto SuperStar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: North Norfolk
Posts: 5,320
Pleiades is on a distinguished road
The silencer length is considerably less critical than the header length or total exhaust length when it comes to tuning an exhaust (and pipe diameter or course). As Maxwell implies, the silencer is just that, a sound deadening devise.

Trouble with two-on-one side setups has always been each pipe from port to outlet is going to be a different length (unless you have a collector box, a 2-1-2 setup, or have loads of very expensive serpent-like bends to compensate). Each exhaust valve then ends up operating under slightly different conditions (scavenging and back-pressure), resulting in loss of torque and consequently power. I seem to remember the very first Metal Mule 2-1 system (very unequal length headers) supplied to Damian I'Anson (ex Bike magazine) for his Himalayan altitude record attempt lost midrange and had various other "holes" in the torque curve, which he could only partially correct with a Power Commander on the dyno, and put down to the header design.
  # 5  
Old 28-09-12, 15:40
coffeebaron coffeebaron is offline
Expert XT-Moto
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Lancaster
Posts: 68
coffeebaron is on a distinguished road
I agree with you Pleiades, and the header length is the most critical part, as can diameter, however from speaking with the fabricator who created my system, he was explaining that whilst on multi cylinder bikes the end can length is more sound based, the length does have a more pronounced affect with singles, hence why the XTX ones as standard are so long.

Interesting about the metal mule one, I assume they since revised their design?

Mine was based on equal measurments to the standards, and this did result in interesting routing, however I hadn't considered the point you made about the port to outlet length. On my system they are quite different in shape, I guess that will be resposible for the loss

Thanks for sharing the information.
  # 6  
Old 28-09-12, 15:46
Pleiades Pleiades is offline
XT-Moto SuperStar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: North Norfolk
Posts: 5,320
Pleiades is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by coffeebaron View Post
Interesting about the metal mule one, I assume they since revised their design?
No. They are still exactly the same design as they were. You can see evidence of uneven gas pressure and temperature distribution in most MM systems fiitted to XTs for any length of time, as they have significantly different discolouration on the rhs (shorter header), when compared to the left.

But to give MM some credit they were never sold as "performance" systems, they were/are marketed to aid ground clearance and reduce weight (which they do very well).
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:41.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

  XT660         Archive   Main site


Footer
vBSkinworks Top