.: XT660.com - The #1 XT660 Resource :.

.: XT660.com - The #1 XT660 Resource :. ( https://www.xt660.com/index.php)
-   XT660Z Mods ( https://www.xt660.com/forumdisplay.php?f=165)
-   -   H7 LED bulb ( https://www.xt660.com/showthread.php?t=26357)

Arjen 28-10-16 11:40

H7 LED bulb
 
Hello,

Yesterday I fitted a H7 LED for the low beam to my xt660z. The bulb has a LED on one side. I can fit the bulb either facing the LED upwards or downwards.

Does anyone know if it matters how a fit the bulb?

https://www.mymotor.nl/media/catalog...ed-lumen-2.jpg

When I look at the picture above the bulb is fitted with the LED down but in the manual that comes with the light it's facing upwards.

Pleiades 28-10-16 11:54

You do realise you won't be able to see jack sh!t at night with that bulb... either fitted facing up or down! ;)

The locating lug on the bulb's base plate determines which way it fits. It will only go in to the back of the headlight unit one way.

Arjen 28-10-16 13:54

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pleiades (Post 226069)
You do realise you won't be able to see jack sh!t at night with that bulb... either fitted facing up or down! ;)

The locating lug on the bulb's base plate determines which way it fits. It will only go in to the back of the headlight unit one way.


May I ask why you don't see anything at night with this bulb?

You have to fit the grey base plate with the lug first. In this baseplate you can fit the rest of the light just like for example a normal rear light bulb is fitted. You can fit it with the LED facing up or down.

Pleiades 28-10-16 18:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arjen (Post 226074)
May I ask why you don't see anything at night with this bulb?

Mainly because the headlight reflector (and lens to a degree) are designed to work with a filament type bulb and not an LED, or HID for that matter. The nature of LED bulb design means that they are a bulky affair and there has to be a considerable supporting structure for the diodes which is opaque and interrupts the dispersal of light. Also, in the example shown in your photo, the three diodes are spread over a relatively wide area; the light emitting zone is not in one place so the light source is impossible to position at the focal point of the reflector (or the point at which the reflector was designed for). A traditional halogen bulb glows most brightly at the exact centre of the filament in a tiny but dense area which can sit at the focal point and crucially, the light emitted from that spot travels in every direction (360 degrees in every plane) and can make full use of the whole reflecting surface, unlike an LED bulb which can only emit light in one direction and at best to about 160 degrees.

A lot of baloney is talked about Lumens, but it is not a very good measure of the effectiveness of a light source. Lumens is an over simplistic measure of total light produced, not the amount that is focussed and 'useful'; it looks good on paper, which is why it's often quoted in the sales pitch. Lux is a far better measure at it is 1 Lumen per square metre, in other words focussed, useful light. An LED bulb may produce 3000 Lumens on the test bench and a halogen bulb just 1600, but with the halogen bulb nearly all the 1600 Lumens are useful. Generally speaking an LED bulb in a non-standard installation will be a third of the efficiency (two thirds of the Lumens are wasted). Your LED bulb will 'look' brighter (mainly because of the higher colour temperature tricking your eyes), but who looks at their headlight? It will more than likely put two thirds less 'focussed' light on the road, plus high colour temperature (bluer) light is far more prone to scatter than light towards the red end of the spectrum so in fog, rain etc. it will be even less efficient.

Aftermarket HIDs are slightly better, but the arc which emits the light is most intense at each end (think of it as 'dog bone' shaped). The weakest part of the arc is at the focal point meaning less focussed light and loads of glare, scatter and wasted light caused by the bright ends of the arc sitting outside the focal point. This is mainly why aftermarket HIDs 'appear' brighter (colour temperature helps this illusion) and why they are an annoyance to other road users.

HIDs work most efficiently in purpose designed refractor, or projector headlight units. LEDs only work anything like properly in purpose designed complete units such as you see on top end Audis, BMWs etc. and you should take a look at the complexity/expense of the design including the intelligent cooling system and massive heat-sinks required to reduce junction temperature.

Fit them, see how you get on with them... but don't expect miracles! ;)

Arjen 28-10-16 18:39

Thanks for your explanation :thumbsup:

Cozi70 28-10-16 21:06

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pepsi (Post 226082)
Seriously buddy....an H7 HID low beam fitment IS a massive improvement over a bog standard filament. It's just a matter of how much you care about local regulations pertaining to HIDs on motorcycles. As for oncoming drivers' discomfort, well that's easily dialled out by beam adjustment without losing the newly acquired improvement.

As stated, buy one, try one but I'll be utterly aghast if you don't see a huge improvement. Check out any of the millions of bike specific forums on the subject and you'll always get a positive result.

I've fitted HIDs to most of my bikes, FJR 13, Fazer 1000, CB1300, blar, blar, blar and there is no way I wouldn't fit a HID to another bike unless the space was unavailable.



$20NZ for an 'experiment'..............go on !

I have a load of spare hid bits here from various previous bike/car projects. I have 4300 and 6000k h7 bulbs and a suitable ballast box,but earlier this year I quickly looked at fitting a kit to my xt660z and recalled a strange mounting ring holding in the original standard bulb so left it as is.
What way do others modify this mount to accept an alternative bulb.

Cheers

Colin J

Pleiades 28-10-16 21:09

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pepsi (Post 226082)
As for oncoming drivers' discomfort, well that's easily dialled out by beam adjustment without losing the newly acquired improvement.

Beam adjustment will make little or no difference to the annoyance factor, the point being that the annoyance is caused by glare and scatter from the unfocused portion of light - that which lies outside the 'beam'.

Pleiades 28-10-16 21:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pepsi (Post 226085)
not sure I agree with you P. Light is light and ends where you see it fall. It travels in straight lines and does not bend or divert unless passing through a liquid, or directed by a reflective surface. Tune a beam to a particular direction in a fully dark environment and what is lit is light and was is not lit is not lit up.

According to scientific theory (and practice) the above 'Pepsonian' theory doesn't quite hold water. The flaw being that light scatters, and it is most evident not in a solid or liquid, but gases - which, as far as I am aware, the atmosphere through which our headlights shine is composed of! The scientist Lord Rayleigh discovered this in the late 19th century - a very very long time before HIDs were thought of.

Scatter is what causes glare, and glare is what causes aftermarket HIDs (and LEDs) to be an annoyance.

Do a quick search on Rayleigh Scattering and you see where the issue lies. Here's a snippet from Wikipedia to whet the appetite...

Rayleigh scattering (pronounced /ˈreɪli/ ray-lee), named after the British physicist Lord Rayleigh (John William Strutt),[1] is the (dominantly) elastic scattering of light or other electromagnetic radiation by particles much smaller than the wavelength of the radiation. Rayleigh scattering does not change the state of material and is, hence, a parametric process. The particles may be individual atoms or molecules. It can occur when light travels through transparent solids and liquids, but is most prominently seen in gases. Rayleigh scattering results from the electric polarizability of the particles. The oscillating electric field of a light wave acts on the charges within a particle, causing them to move at the same frequency. The particle therefore becomes a small radiating dipole whose radiation we see as scattered light.

Whilst I get where you're coming from and I don't disagree that YOU can see better at night with your HID headlight, we'll have to agree to disagree on the annoyance issue. I'm sure the roads are quiet at night down in Portugal, hardly any oncoming traffic, but here in the UK, aftermarket HIDs have become a real menace in the last five years, despite it meaning an MOT fail (for cars anyway).

Pleiades 28-10-16 21:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pepsi (Post 226086)
a mere perception issue on the part of the oncoming driver....Lesson 1.....don't stare at oncoming lights unless you're genetically linked to a moth.

And glare is something that your eyes detect without actually looking at the light source. No one looks directly at the sun (unless they're daft), but we all wear sunglasses in the summer because of... glare.

Pleiades 28-10-16 22:08

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pepsi (Post 226089)
I remember sat by the open fire and saying to my dad "I'm burning " and he said well "don't sit so fu (k1ng close then" . Lesson 2 is ...reduce your exposure to the irritation, but then again the standard of 'Brit' drivers leaves a lot to chance there.

I better not go out at night then! ;)

Pleiades 28-10-16 22:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pepsi (Post 226091)
glare IS light Pete. That's why you need sunglasses. It's reflected energy.

Indeed, glare is light, but it is scattered light (straylight). When you get dazzled the intraocular scattering causes veil luminance on the retina's surface, which reduces image contrast which in turn impairs vision. It is not exclusively reflected, it can come from an emitting source such as the sun (or a HID headlight ;) ).

Cozi70 01-11-16 22:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cozi70 (Post 226083)
I have a load of spare hid bits here from various previous bike/car projects. I have 4300 and 6000k h7 bulbs and a suitable ballast box,but earlier this year I quickly looked at fitting a kit to my xt660z and recalled a strange mounting ring holding in the original standard bulb so left it as is.
What way do others modify this mount to accept an alternative bulb.

Cheers

Colin J

Any answers folks?

Pleiades 01-11-16 23:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cozi70 (Post 226225)
Any answers folks?

As you can tell, I'm not exactly a fan of retro-fit HIDs so I obviously I haven't fitted them and can't answer directly. However, I've found one post buried deep in an old thread that probably has the answer/info you're looking for...

http://www.xt660.com/showpost.php?p=179529&postcount=67

It does involve some irreversible butchery of the main beam bulb holder/connector.

What I'd also add is that, because of the slow 'warm-up' time of HIDs, you will need to do the mod that keeps dip beam on all the time regardless of switch position. If you do not do this mod you will end up with a few seconds of very poor lighting every time you flick from dip to main or vice-versa as the HIDs get up to temperature.

See here:

http://www.xt660.com/showpost.php?p=203832&postcount=8

Desert Racer 01-11-16 23:35

Sorry can't help with modifying the mount. I just upgrade the standard bulbs to Narva 110% Intense H7 bulbs, which helped, then ended up fitting spot lights down the track anyway.
( The bulbs are still 55watt, I think the reason the main & dip are both 55 watt is so if one blows out in the medal of nowhere then you just use the one working one left in either light till you can get a replacement ? )


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:43.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions Inc.